Fixing A Rigged Game Of Monopoly Aug 7 Written By Kimberly Riley Foreword: The Unassailable Case IntroductionI. THE GRIEVANCE: What Are We Repairing? A. Specific Economic Harms B. Non-Economic Harms C. Quantification StrategyII. LEGAL SUPPORT FOR THE GRIEVANCEA. Unjust Enrichment/Compensation for Forced Labor B. Property Rights & Theft C. Discriminatory Economic Practices/Violation of Equal Protection/Opportunity D. Non-Economic Harms (Black Fatigue/Intergenerational Trauma) III. THE BENEFICIARIES: Who Qualifies for Redress? IV. THE RESPONSIBLE PARTIES: Who Owes the Debt? A. The United States Federal Government B. State and Local Governments C. Private Institutions and CorporationsV. AVENUES OF REDRESS: What Would Reparations Look Like? I. Monetary Reparations (Addressing the Wealth/Opportunity Deficit) II. Non-Monetary Reparations (Addressing Systemic Harms & Black Fatigue) III. Examining Truth Commissions: A Core Component of "Satisfaction" IV. Application to U.S. Reparations for Black Americans VI. METHOD OF EXECUTION: Implementing the Reparations Framework I. Foundational Mechanism: Federal Legislation II. The Central Administrative Body: National Reparations Commission/Office III. Preventing Fraudulent Qualification VII. AVENUES OF REDRESS: Practical Implementation Mechanisms A. Monetary ComponentsB. Land Restitution/ReclamationC. Educational InitiativesD. Healthcare & Wellness Programs (Addressing Black Fatigue)E. Cultural & Memorialization ProjectsF. Systemic Legal and Justice Reforms (Guarantees of Non-Repetition)V. Integration of Other Responsible PartiesVI. Phased ImplementationVIII. ADDRESSING COMMON COUNTER ARGUMENTS Conclusion: The Imperative of a Reset Kimberly Riley
Fixing A Rigged Game Of Monopoly Aug 7 Written By Kimberly Riley Foreword: The Unassailable Case IntroductionI. THE GRIEVANCE: What Are We Repairing? A. Specific Economic Harms B. Non-Economic Harms C. Quantification StrategyII. LEGAL SUPPORT FOR THE GRIEVANCEA. Unjust Enrichment/Compensation for Forced Labor B. Property Rights & Theft C. Discriminatory Economic Practices/Violation of Equal Protection/Opportunity D. Non-Economic Harms (Black Fatigue/Intergenerational Trauma) III. THE BENEFICIARIES: Who Qualifies for Redress? IV. THE RESPONSIBLE PARTIES: Who Owes the Debt? A. The United States Federal Government B. State and Local Governments C. Private Institutions and CorporationsV. AVENUES OF REDRESS: What Would Reparations Look Like? I. Monetary Reparations (Addressing the Wealth/Opportunity Deficit) II. Non-Monetary Reparations (Addressing Systemic Harms & Black Fatigue) III. Examining Truth Commissions: A Core Component of "Satisfaction" IV. Application to U.S. Reparations for Black Americans VI. METHOD OF EXECUTION: Implementing the Reparations Framework I. Foundational Mechanism: Federal Legislation II. The Central Administrative Body: National Reparations Commission/Office III. Preventing Fraudulent Qualification VII. AVENUES OF REDRESS: Practical Implementation Mechanisms A. Monetary ComponentsB. Land Restitution/ReclamationC. Educational InitiativesD. Healthcare & Wellness Programs (Addressing Black Fatigue)E. Cultural & Memorialization ProjectsF. Systemic Legal and Justice Reforms (Guarantees of Non-Repetition)V. Integration of Other Responsible PartiesVI. Phased ImplementationVIII. ADDRESSING COMMON COUNTER ARGUMENTS Conclusion: The Imperative of a Reset Kimberly Riley